techwear
Patent for object recognition
Filed in archive Market by on September 13, 2005
BlogPicture

Sorry, but sometimes I dont understand the US way to handle a patent.

One good example. I think that it makes sense to use wearable computing technologies for toys. But whenever you think about a combination with RFID just forget it, there is a patent already.
Ok, i got the part that if s/o wants to make money with it they need a patent. But what's that.

"Each play object has a RFID tag IC. Each tag IC has a memory holding digital data that includes at least ID information different from that of the other play objects." Patent hereIn such general terms - you could write: I have a patent for everything that uses RFID and a kid would call a toy. I guess there is no better way to stop good competition. Sorry again.

Related Entries:

Permalink: Patent for object recognition
Tags: Patent  RFID 
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/9236
img Addthis img Ask img Blinklist img del.icio.us img Digg img Fark img Facebook img Google img Lycos img Ma.gnolia Add this page to Mister Wong Mr Wong img Netscape img Netvousz img Newsvine img Reddit img StumbleUpon img Slashdot img Tailrank img Technorati img Wink img Yahoo

Vote for Patent for object recognition:

  • Currently 10.00/10
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Rating: 10.00 out of 1 vote(s) cast.
 
Subscribe
Share It
RSSrss
See all blog subscribe options
Google google
What is RSS?
Yahoo! yahoo
Addthis Subscribe using any feed reader!
Bloglines Bloglines
Newsletter

TwitterFollow us on Twitter!